There have been times when Conservative leaders have sounded almost sensible superficially – and alternate phases where they have come across as animal crackers, yet were still adored by party loyalists. Currently, it's far from either of those times. A leading Tory failed to inspire attendees when she spoke at her conference, despite she offered the divisive talking points of migrant-baiting she thought they wanted.
This wasn't primarily that they’d all arisen with a revived feeling of humanity; more that they didn’t believe she’d ever be able to follow through. It was, fake vegan meat. Tories hate that. A veteran Tory apparently called it a “themed procession”: boisterous, energetic, but nonetheless a goodbye.
Some are having a fresh look at a particular MP, who was a hard “no” at the start of the night – but with proceedings winding down, and everyone else has left. Some are fostering a interest around Katie Lam, a young parliamentarian of the newest members, who presents as a countryside-based politician while filling her online profiles with border-control messaging.
Could she be the leader to counter opposition forces, now leading the incumbents by a substantial lead? Can we describe for defeating opponents by adopting their policies? And, assuming no phrase fits, maybe we can adopt a term from fighting disciplines?
It isn't necessary to consider overseas examples to grasp this point, or consult the scholar's groundbreaking study, Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy: every one of your synapses is shouting it. Moderate conservatism is the crucial barrier resisting the radical elements.
The central argument is that political systems endure by satisfying the “propertied and powerful” happy. I have reservations as an guiding tenet. One gets the impression as though we’ve been catering to the affluent and connected for decades, at the expense of the broader population, and they rarely appear adequately satisfied to cease desiring to make cuts out of public assistance.
Yet his research isn’t a hunch, it’s an archival deep dive into the pre-Nazi German National People’s Party during the Weimar Republic (along with the England's ruling party circa 1906). Once centrist parties becomes uncertain, if it commences to adopt the buzzwords and symbolic politics of the far right, it hands them the direction.
A key figure aligning with Steve Bannon was one particularly egregious example – but far-right flirtation has become so pronounced now as to overshadow all remaining party narratives. What happened to the traditional Tories, who value continuity, preservation, the constitution, the pride of Britain on the world stage?
Why have we lost the modernisers, who defined the United Kingdom in terms of growth centers, not powder kegs? Don’t get me wrong, I had reservations regarding either faction either, but the contrast is dramatic how such perspectives – the one nation Tory, the Cameroonian Conservative – have been eliminated, superseded by relentless demonisation: of migrants, religious groups, welfare recipients and protesters.
And talk about issues they reject. They portray protests by 75-year-old pacifists as “festivals of animosity” and display banners – union flags, English symbols, any item featuring a splash of matadorial colour – as an clear provocation to individuals doubting that being British through and through is the best thing a person could possibly be.
We observe an absence of any inherent moderation, where they check back in with their own values, their historical context, their own plan. Any stick the Reform leader throws for them, they pursue. So, absolutely not, it’s not fun to observe their collapse. They’re taking democratic norms down with them.
A passionate curator and advocate for Australian artisans, dedicated to showcasing unique handmade creations.